Here’s the historical grammar behind the singular they:
Language Evolves.
Psych!
According to the APA, in the sentence The cake is for them., them can refer to one person. Merriam-Webster’s made the call a couple of years ago, and “they” can be singular. MLA? Not so much. The Modern Language Association is sticking to its guns on the whole singular/plural issue.
As an English teacher, I have a few choices.
- 1. Retain my militant stance and risk excluding a non-binary student.
- 2. Teach the historical grammar rule, explain the evolution of language, and let individual students decide for themselves where to fall.
- 3. Turn the issue into a teachable moment and have my students design a debate. As a class, we decide.
- 4. Discuss the issue with my department and come to consensus. Good luck on that one.
- 5. Choose a style manual and follow its rule (See what I did there? Not their rule. Its rule.) If your school uses MLA, perhaps the decision is made for you.
- 6. Teach students to code switch. In formal writing, stick with the historical rule. In casual spoken language, evolve.
- 7. Have students recast their sentences. I used to teach that a student had three choices. Be sexist by referring to everyone with a generic he.
Be grammatically incorrect by referring to a single person as they.
Be awkward with something goofy like s/he or he or she.
It doesn’t have to be that way. Here’s an UGLY sentence: Every person in our country needs to be able to justify himself or herself by following a moral code.
Clumsy, right? Let’s try to tidy it up without changing the meaning. Attempt #1: Every American should follow a moral code. Attempt #2: Every American is justified by a personal moral code.
Don’t want to go against Warriner’s? Don’t want to offend? Just do some reconfiguring, and the issue is resolved.